COULD DEMOCRATS HATE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ANY MORE?
After the San Bernardino shooting, the percentage of Americans who were living in fear of another terrorist attack was at 79%. After 9/11, it was at 78%… and THIS is the legislation they feel is appropriate?
SAVE ROOM IN THE GALLOWS FOR THIS CREW…
While we were all busy celebrating the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ and spending time with our families during the Christmas holidays House Democrats were focused on the most important issue this country faces- the well-being of MUSLIMS!
That’s right folks. Sharia law is alive and kicking in America thanks to our Muslim-in-Chief and his liberal minions.
Democrat Congressmen quietly sponsored House Resolution 569 on December 17.
Among the people that sponsored the resolution are Muslim Congressmen Keith Ellison and Andre Carson, as well as Eleanor Holmes Norton, Loretta Sanchez, Charles Rangel, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Joe Kennedy, Al Green, Judy Chu, Debbie Dingell, Niki Tsongas, John Conyers, José Serrano, Hank Johnson, and many others, House Resolution 569 condemns “violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.” The Resolution has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, According to Front Page Magazine.
Lumping together “hate speech” and “violence” is a dangerous concept. This implies that simply criticizing Islam is equal to actual violent acts. Apparently these idiots have never heard of the FIRST AMENDMENT.
The government tells citizens “if you see something, say something.” This law makes that virtually impossible to do, that is unless you are a Muslim.
According to Congress.gov, the resolution reads:
“Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the House of Representatives denounces in the strongest terms the increase of hate speech, intimidation, violence, vandalism, arson, and other hate crimes targeted against mosques, Muslims, or those perceived to be Muslim; urges local and Federal law enforcement authorities to work to prevent hate crimes; and to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law those perpetrators of hate crimes”
The inclusion of condemnations of “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric” in this Resolution, while appearing to be high-minded, take on an ominous character when one recalls the fact that for years, Ellison, Carson, and his allies (including groups such as the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR) have been smearing any and all honest examination of how Islamic jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to incite hatred and violence as “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric.” This Resolution is using the specter of violence against Muslims to try to quash legitimate research into the motives and goals of those who have vowed to destroy us, which will have the effect of allowing the jihad to advance unimpeded and unopposed.
Why are we so interested in protecting Muslims? What have they done to earn this special attention? Christians don’t get a special resolution and either do Italians! I used Italian as an example because I am half Italian. But while I’m at it, Italians, including my family, contributed to the cultural and economic fabric and well-being of United States society.
And that’s exactly what the Democrats insist that MUSLIMS have done!
“Whereas this Muslim community is recognized as having made innumerable contributions to the cultural and economic fabric and well-being of United States society.”
What have they contributed? Terrorist attacks on U.S. soil? All I see from them are lawsuits because they refuse to remove the rags off of their heads or deliver alcohol. Or poisoning our schools with their backwards beliefs and complaining about ham and bacon. Not to mention they have to kneel on the ground 20 times a day to worship Allah after washing their stinking feet in our sinks.
I suppose I sound a tad unhinged but we have a big problem here folks. When Muslims become more important than the rest of us in the eyes of our government we are in big trouble.
In conclusion, the bill ridiculously compares criticizing Islam as a violation of Muslims’ “civil rights,” as if disagreeing or even openly mocking someone’s beliefs is unconstitutional. Our forefathers had exactly political and religious mockery in mind when they penned our amendments, having experience the violation of limited speech and worship by their own King George III.
Indeed, free speech was never intended to defend inoffensive speech, because inoffensive speech needs no protection. Freedom of speech is solely for the offensive, meant to prevent those who would limit it because of their opposing beliefs.
We are witnessing the very implementation of Sharia law as it has always been established in every modern-day Islamic country. Of course they wouldn’t start by legalizing the execution of homosexuals or mandating the hijab for every woman, because we wouldn’t accept being forced to adopt full Sharia right off the bat. You can’t cook a frog by placing him in scalding water — he’ll jump out. However, you can slowly increase the temperature until he is boiling before he ever knew the water was uncomfortable.
Once we’ve lost our freedom of speech, all our other freedoms will follow suit. This is well-known and intended by the Muslim community, the majority of whom admit to wanting Sharia law. The only way to stop them from infringing upon our speech is to use it. Now more than ever, we must speak out against this stealth jihad and fascism that seeks to overthrow our Constitution for a religious and political legislature, lest we substitute one tyrant of old for new ones.
(H/T Right Wing Tribune)
FOR MORE ON LIBERALISM: THE IDEOLOGY OF HATE, GENOCIDE, & IDIOCY:
BE SURE TO GO MY PROFILE’S BELOW AT OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA:
THE VOICE OF REASON
- WEBSITE: https://thelastgreatstand.com/
- FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/LastGreatStand
- TWITTER: https://twitter.com/#!/LastGreatStand
- TEA PARTY COMMUNITY: https://www.teapartycommunity.com/profile-151600/
- SEEN.IS: https://www.seen.is/members/home
- RIGHT.IS: http://right.is/contributor/pages/351/169/bio.html