In the first video, you’ll learn that even though President Obama cannot bring himself to utter the words “Islamic Terrorist,” his Muslim CIA Chief is at least a bit more honest about the threat, saying recently that a domestic terror attack is “inevitable,” or is he? In a recent 60 minutes interview included below, CIA Chief Brennan says Islamic terrorists will inevitably make their way to the United States to carry out a terror attack on US soil.
The question posed in the first video, is why CIA Director Brennan is coming out and making the announcement on 60 minutes? Granted, it’s CBS and not Fox News, so only 7-8 people saw it anyway, but still, any RESPONSIBLE journalist in the mainstream media SHOULD be asking, “Why is Brennan saying that? What is the motive for it?”
Let’s face it, unless Americans have reached the point of Kool-Aid poisoning, it shouldn’t take a “conspiracy minded” person to recognize that no CIA director under any administration (Republican or Democrat), is going to go on national television and make a statement like that which isn’t highly calculated and well thought out in advance.
The Obama administration is arguably the most highly politically calculating administration in the modern era, so Brennan’s comments definitely had a purpose. So, why did he do it? In the video, Gary Franchi poses a theory or two…
Here is my question: Has Obama and his radical leftist/communist agenda already won? In the post titled, Border Patrol Union: Obama Ordered Release Of Criminal Aliens, Illegal Immigrants, I include articles from THREE different sources saying border agents are required to release KNOWN illegal aliens who have committed previous crimes in this country, and IF border agents follow the law and ask illegal aliens why they are coming to the U.S. they will be terminated, per orders from Barack Obama. That’s only if they are one of the Border Agents still lucky enough to still have a job to speak of. In the ultimate kick in the face to the American people, Obama cut the border patrol in half too, and not a peep from the mainstream media!
There is an Ex-ISIS Fighter Who Has Revealed ISIS Plans To Nuke 4 Major Cities (Video), yet Obama not only refuses to beef up the nation’s safety at the border, but he also deliberately undermines and weakens it. With the world already so close to World War III in Syria, where the Russians have not ruled out using tactical nukes, and the threat posed by Islamic extremism here at home, The Department Of Justice and DHS Are Preparing To Step Up War On "Domestic Extremists.” What?!?!?!
Let’s be clear about what they define as a “Domestic Extremist.” Thanks to a Freedom of Information Act request, Judicial Watch recently obtained a Department of Defense training manual that defines it for us. A “domestic extremist” is defined as:
“Americans who are ‘reverent of individual liberty,’ and ‘suspicious of centralized federal authority’ are possible ‘extreme right-wing’ terrorists.
The document linked above also lists people who embrace “individual liberties” and honor “states’ rights,” among other characteristics, as potential “extremists” who are likely to be members of “hate groups.”
Finally, the document goes on to call the Founding Fathers, “extremists.”
Don't kid yourself into thinking the coming 2016 election has the potential to "save" or "fix" the damage done to this country by Barack Obama. It’s no coincidence that as a direct result of President Obama, the two GOP front runners are equally as divisive (for the country as a whole) as Obama was when he was elected, and their Communist… excuse me, I mean their Democrat counterparts are even worse!
Which candidate I support in the race is irrelevant, so my comment is not intended to enflame the rabid supporters of either Trump or Cruz, but ask yourself, if all four of the top four candidates for President promise to make this country even MORE divided than it is now… which is the case…
HAS OBAMA ALREADY WON????
The question here may be less will they and more have they. CIA Director John Brennan told CBS’ 60 Minutes that he views ISIS attempts to attack the US as “inevitable.” He follows that up by saying that successful attacks are not necessarily inevitable, but have they already taken place?
Scott Pelley: Is ISIS coming here?
John Brennan: I think ISIL does want to eventually find it’s, it’s mark here.
Scott Pelley: You’re expecting an attack in the United States?
John Brennan: I’m expecting them to try to put in place the operatives, the material or whatever else that they need to do or to incite people to carry out these attacks, clearly. So I believe that their attempts are inevitable. I don’t think their successes necessarily are.
What constitutes an attack attempt? The San Bernardino attack at least appears to qualify. At least one of the two perpetrators, Tashfeen Malik, came to the US after becoming radicalized abroad and may have posted pro-ISIS propaganda online during the attack. Syed Farook reportedly had conducted “overseas communications” with people the FBI suspected of organizing terrorism. Two weeks before the attack, Farook got $28,500 under mysterious circumstances.
For a larger-scale attack, ISIS might face more difficulties; at least they haven’t attempted a Paris-style attack here yet. Brennan tells CBS that the Paris attacks were a failure of intelligence, and a lesson to his own organization:
Scott Pelley: What did you learn from Paris?
John Brennan: That there is a lot that ISIL probably has underway that we don’t have obviously full insight into. We knew the system was blinking red. We knew just in the days before that ISIL was trying to carry out something. But the individuals involved have been able to take advantage of the newly available means of communication that are–that are walled off, from law enforcement officials. …
We gotta work harder. We have to work harder. We need to have the capabilities, the technical capabilities, the human sources. We need to be able to have advanced notice about this so that we can take this– the steps to stop them. Believe me, intelligence security services have stopped numerous attacks– operatives– that have been moved from maybe the Iraq to Syria theater into Europe. They have been stopped and interdicted and arrested and detained and debriefed because of very, very good intelligence.
And that’s doubly important, now that ISIS has increased its capabilities in a very alarming direction:
Scott Pelley: Does ISIS have chemical weapons?
John Brennan: We have a number of instances where ISIL has used chemical munitions on the battlefield.
Scott Pelley: Artillery shells.
John Brennan: Sure. Yeah.
Scott Pelley: ISIS has access to chemical artillery shells?
John Brennan: Uh-huh (affirm). There are reports that ISIS has access to chemical precursors and munitions that they can use.
Interestingly, Reuters corroborated that claim in an exclusive report this afternoon:
Islamic State militants attacked Kurdish forces in Iraq with mustard gas last year, in the first known use of chemical weapons in Iraq since the fall of Saddam Hussein, a diplomat said, after tests by the global chemical arms watchdog.
A source at the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) confirmed that laboratory tests had come back positive for the sulfur mustard, after around 35 Kurdish troops were sickened on the battlefield last August.
The OPCW will not identify who used the chemical agent. But the diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity because the findings have not yet been released, said the result confirmed that chemical weapons had been used by Islamic State fighters.
All of the above underscores the need for a forward strategy against ISIS rather than a reactive strategy. The US and its allies have tried to pick apart ISIS with a light precision-bombing campaign, but the terror quasi-state has expanded into Libya and moved to weapons of mass destruction in the meantime. Brennan says the CIA is doing its part, with both intelligence and operational covert assets on the ground. That would help destroy ISIS as part of a massive, coordinated offensive to dislodge, isolate, and trap ISIS’ army, but the air-alone war appears to have only done mild damage and encouraged ISIS to harden its assets. Brennan has a tough job, but an even tougher task selling current US strategy against ISIS as anywhere close to sufficient for the administration’s declared goals.
FOR MORE ON OBAMA’S UTTER LAWLESSNESS:
FOR MORE ON OBAMA'S TREASONOUS ACTS!
|THE VOICE OF REASON:|
|Tea Party Community||https://www.teapartycommunity.com/profile-151600/|
DONATIONS ACCEPTED VIA PAYPAL TO GET THE RADIO SHOW RUNNING…
AND THEN TO HELP KEEP SPREADING THE MESSAGE!
COMING SOON TO INTERNET RADIO!